Friday, September 16, 2011
to inconvenience. to disturb. tr.
Currently, for arrests in front of the White House, you do not need to present the person inconvenienced, or claim that there is such a person.
But even if there exists a person who is inconvenienced, can it be that the first amendment protects actions only as long as no one is bothered by them?
There is the additional question, who is being inconvenienced more? Those who have to squeeze in among demonstrators to see the fountain, or those who have to travel to Washington to demonstrate against corruption at the highest levels?
Is there any reason that the interests of those who have a permit should not be satisfied first?
Or, failing that, first-come, first-served?
Thursday, September 15, 2011
01. 2011/08/30, XL Pipeline, Darryl Hanna and 1300 others arrested
HuffPost USAToday Hansen Lakota NaomiKlein
02. 2011/07/26, deportation, Rep Gutierrez and 10 others arrested
03. 2011/07/11, Columbia Free Trade Agreement, 4 arrests
PeaceFellowship TeamsterNation TheCommunity
04. 2011/03/19, War, VFP MFSO, 113 arrests
06. 2010/12/16, Peace, Ellsburg, Hedges, McGovern, Flowers and 127 others
07. 2010/11/15, DontAsk, Lt Choi and 15 others
08. 2010/09/27, Mountain Top Removal, James Hansen and 100 others
09.2010/06/02, human rights abuses in Peru, Pocahontas
11. 2010/03/20, War, Sheehan, Sweet, and 4 others
12. 2010/03/18, DontAsk, Lt Choi, and 2 others
16. 2009/10/05, War, 61 including David Swanson, VFP, WAT(Martha), and others
21. 2008/02/28, War, CW/Iowa & Minnesota, U/Iowa, Voices for Creative Nonviolence and 1 other